Stroda v. Joice Holdings, LLC
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Nuss, J.:
This case requires us to determine the extent of an easement that the parties agree had been created by implication. The trial court held that the easement could be used for access across the servient tenement to a future residence on the dominant tenement and for utilities to that residence. The owner of the servient tenement appeals both rulings. We affirm.
FACTS
In 1952, Lawrence and Etta Stroda, grandparents of Ed Stroda, purchased Douglas County farmground containing an occupied residence: the Northwest Quarter (NW Vi). They were allowed an…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Unified School District No. 233 v. Kansas Ass'n of American EducatorsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
- Fristoe v. DrapeauCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- City of Arkansas City v. BrutonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
- Atkinson v. MentzelCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997
- Jowers v. HornsbySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Soto v. City of Bonner SpringsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
- Palmer v. R. A. Yancey Lumber Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2017
- Family v. PomeroyColorado Court of Appeals · 2021
- Francini v. Goodspeed Airport, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
- McCoy v. BarrCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.