Legal Opinion

Shammel v. Canyon Resources Corp.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 24, 2003No. 02-736PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Leaphart

¶1 Canyon Resources Corporation and CR Kendall (collectively referred to as Canyon) appeal from the Tenth Judicial District Court’s grant of a preliminary injunction and the denial of a motion for an undertaking for security in Fergus County.

¶2 We restate the issues on appeal as follows:

¶3 1. Did the District Court err when it granted the preliminary injunction?

¶4 2. Did the District Court err when it denied Canyon’s motion for a written undertaking as provided for under § 27-19-306, MCA?

Factual and Procedural Background

¶5 From the late 1980s to the mid-1990s, CR Kendall, a Colorado…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Deckert v. Independence Shares Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. In Re Estate Of Ferdinand MarcosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  3. Ducham v. TumaMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Sweet Grass Farms, Ltd. v. Board of County CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Engel v. GamppMontana Supreme Court · 2000

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. Reichert v. STATE EX REL. McCULLOCHMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Larson v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2019
  3. McDermott v. CARIE, LLCMontana Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Davis v. WestphalMontana Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Byrum v. AndrenMontana Supreme Court · 2007

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API