Legal Opinion

Albert G. Hoyem Trust v. Galt

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1998No. 98-057PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Trieweiler

¶ 1 The plaintiffs, Andrew Hoyem and Anna Fitzgerald, filed suit on behalf of the Albert G. Hoyem Trust in the District Court for the Fourteenth Judicial District in Meagher County against Errol T. Galt and Sharrie Galt to judicially establish in Hoyem Trust’s favor an unrestricted easement or way of necessity over and across certain real property owned by Gaits. Both parties filed motions for summary judgment. The District Court denied Hoyem Trust’s motion and granted Gaits’ motion. Hoyem Trust appeals the District Court’s order and judgment. We affirm the judgment of the District Court.

¶2…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bruner v. Yellowstone CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Mead v. M.S.B., Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Graham v. MacKMontana Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Schmid v. McDowellMontana Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Ruana v. GrigonisMontana Supreme Court · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Carroll v. MeredithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2001
  2. Blazer v. WallMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Gosney v. GlennCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2005
  4. Leichtfuss v. DabneyMontana Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Kullick v. Skyline Homeowners Ass'n, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2003

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API