Graham v. MacK
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gulbrandson
This is an appeal from an order quieting title to real property. Plaintiff instituted the action to quiet title and defendant answered claiming an easement of access, by prescription, implication or necessity over plaintiff’s land. The District Court of the Nineteenth Judicial District, in and for Lincoln County, Montana, entered an order quieting title and denying defendant the easement. We affirm.
The following diagram will help in explaining the facts giving rise to this action:
Testimony at trial indicated that the following facts were not in substantial dispute. Dr. James F. Graham,…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Harland v. AndersonMontana Supreme Court · 1976
- Lords v. NewmanMontana Supreme Court · 1984
- Thisted v. Country Club Tower Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1965
- Medhus v. DutterMontana Supreme Court · 1979
- Taylor v. PetranekMontana Supreme Court · 1977
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Halverson v. TurnerMontana Supreme Court · 1994
- Kullick v. Skyline Homeowners Ass'n, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2003
- Keebler v. HardingMontana Supreme Court · 1991
- Loomis v. LuraskiMontana Supreme Court · 2001
- Watson v. DundasMontana Supreme Court · 2006
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.