Legal Opinion

Graham v. MacK

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1985No. 84-310PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gulbrandson

This is an appeal from an order quieting title to real property. Plaintiff instituted the action to quiet title and defendant answered claiming an easement of access, by prescription, implication or necessity over plaintiff’s land. The District Court of the Nineteenth Judicial District, in and for Lincoln County, Montana, entered an order quieting title and denying defendant the easement. We affirm.

The following diagram will help in explaining the facts giving rise to this action:

Testimony at trial indicated that the following facts were not in substantial dispute. Dr. James F. Graham,…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Harland v. AndersonMontana Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Lords v. NewmanMontana Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Thisted v. Country Club Tower Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Medhus v. DutterMontana Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Taylor v. PetranekMontana Supreme Court · 1977

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Halverson v. TurnerMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Kullick v. Skyline Homeowners Ass'n, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Keebler v. HardingMontana Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Loomis v. LuraskiMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Watson v. DundasMontana Supreme Court · 2006

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API