Legal Opinion

Moore v. Giffen

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 26, 1930No. Docket No. 7714PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

Plaintiff sued for the rescission of a contract to purchase a sublease on an oil and gasoline service station together with all equipment and stock in trade. The cause was tried without a jury and the court •gave judgment for plaintiff, from which the defendants appeal on a bill of exceptions.

The defendants had been operating the station under lease and during the year 1924 had averaged a sale of 1242 . gallons of gasoline a day. The Sierra Refining Company was the lessee of the real property and held a contract with defendants for the sale to them at wholesale of all the gasoline dispensed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lady Washington Consolidated Co. v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Bancroft v. WoodwardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Garstang v. SkinnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Ferguson v. EdgarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Schneider v. HenleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kent v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Wichita Terminal Elevator Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1946
  3. Hiltbrand v. HiltbrandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. Campbell v. BirchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Campbell v. BirchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API