Legal Opinion

Hiltbrand v. Hiltbrand

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 21, 1936No. Civ. 10928PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrail, P. J.

The plaintiff brought this action for partition and accounting against her former husband, the defendant, to partition certain property which she alleged was held by the parties in joint tenancy, and for an accounting of the rents and profits therefrom, and also for an accounting of the sum of 3,000 Swiss francs or its equivalent in American money, which the plaintiff alleged was her separate property and was delivered by her to defendant for investment, but was commingled with defendant’s funds and invested. The parties had been divorced. In paragraph VII plaintiff further alleged that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brown v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Jennings v. DavisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1862
  3. Oberwise v. PoulosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Luckenbach v. LuckenbachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Moore v. GiffenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Estate of HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Hammond v. McArthurCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Franklin v. FranklinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  4. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. CavanaghCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
  5. Berry v. BerryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API