Kent v. Clark
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.
The question presented for decision by this appeal is whether, in an action of ejectment brought by a vendor of realty against a vendee in default under an executory contract of sale, the vendee may set up fraud in the inception of the contract, either by way of defense to the action or by way of cross-complaint for rescission or damages. The trial court answered it in the negative and rendered judgment for the respondents, who are the vendors of the property in controversy.
The appellant entered into a written contract with the respondents under which she agreed to purchase a house and lot…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- California Trust Co. v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- O'Meara v. HaidenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- McCall v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Toby v. Oregon Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Palladine v. Imperial Valley Farm Lands Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1924
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Miller v. SearsAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Carruth v. FritchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Runyan v. Pacific Air Industries, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970
- Schaff v. KennellyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
- Kaluzok v. BrissonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.