Legal Opinion

Schneider v. Henley

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 25, 1923No. Civ. No. 4174PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSt. Sure, J.

This is an action to rescind a sale of shares of stock in a mining corporation upon the ground of fraud, and to recover from defendants the sum of one thousand dollars, the price paid for the stock, with interest.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of nonsuit in favor of defendants Henley and Schoenfeld and also from a judgment in favor of defendant Shannon. The two appeals were consolidated for hearing by order of this court.

Plaintiffs, in asking for a reversal, say, at the outset, that they rely upon the decision of the supreme court in the case of Beeman v. Richardson, 185 Cal. 280 [196 Pac.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Blanc v. ConnorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Bailey v. FoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Marten v. Paul O. Burns Wine Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Beeman v. RichardsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Merrill v. KohlbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hauger v. GatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Lobdell v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. Milner v. Earl Fruit Co. of the NorthwestIdaho Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Estrada v. AlvarezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Campbell v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API