Legal Opinion · Dissent

Campbell v. Birch

California Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1942No. L. A. 17907Published

1Dissent

CARTER, J.,

dissenting. — I dissent.

I am unable to agree with either the conclusion reached in the majority opinion or the reasoning upon which it is based. As the conclusion reached therein is based upon inferences drawn from certain facts, I will first state the facts as disclosed by the record.

*795It appears that for some time prior to August 1, 1935, defendant A. Otis Birch had been a tenant of certain real property under a 99-year lease dated June 6, 1928, which had been assigned to him immediately following its execution. The rental payable under said lease was $1,000 per month. Said…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McEwen v. New York Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  2. Light v. StevensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Levey v. HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Moore v. GiffenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API