Mathews v. Heiser

This is an appeal from a judgment which, in effect, holds that the plaintiff was entitled to and did rescind an exchange agreement and is entitled to recover a down payment of five thousand dollars made thereon, together with an item of $229.43 claimed to be the excess of the plaintiff’s expenditures over her receipts while acting as caretaker of the defendant’s property after the rescission.

' Since we conclude that the evidence does not sustain some of the trial court’s findings, and since we are not in accord with the basic conclusions drawn from the facts by the trial court, a statement…