Legal Opinion

Opsjon v. Evard Engebo

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1913No. 10648PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Hinkle, J., entered March 13, 1912, upon findings in favor of the defendants, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action to recover real property.

1Opinion of the CourtGose, J.

On the 14th day of July, 1910, the plaintiff and the defendants entered into a written contract, whereby they agreed to an exchange of certain real property, the defendants paying ten dollars in cash and agreeing to pay $1,-490, with annual interest, on or before the 14th day of July, 1914, the agreed difference in value between the properties. The contract provides that the plaintiff will sell and convey to the defendants eighty acres of land, describing it, by warranty deed, giving abstract showing good title, on or before the 14th day of July, 1914, when the defendants have performed all…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rucker v. SteelmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Douglas v. HanburyWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Walker v. McMurchieWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Whiting v. DoughtonWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Colpe v. LindblomWashington Supreme Court · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Turpen v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Napier v. RunkelWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Wadham v. McVicarWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Tremonton Inv. Co. v. HorneUtah Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Kohler v. LundbergUtah Supreme Court · 1919

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API