Legal Opinion

Mahoney v. Tingley

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 1, 1974No. 1755-1Published

1Opinion of the Court

10 Wn. App. 814 (1974)

520 P.2d 628

LAURA E. MAHONEY, Appellant,

v.

CLAUDE W. TINGLEY et al., Respondents.

No. 1755-1.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.

April 1, 1974.

Bonjorni, Burgeson & Fiori and Duncan A. Bonjorni, for appellant.

Siderius, Lonergan & Crowley and David C. Pearson, for respondents.

HOROWITZ, J.

Plaintiff Laura E. Mahoney sued to recover damages for breach of an earnest money agreement by defendants Claude W. Tingley and Nancy J. Tingley, his wife. Later the court granted defendants' motion for summary judgment of dismissal. Plaintiff appeals.

The controlling issue is…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Broderick Wood Products Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
  2. William Edward Roucher v. Traders & General Insurance Company, Dallas, TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
  3. Gordon v. Deer Park School District No. 414Washington Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Daniel Henry Arney and Charles H. Baker v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  5. Hogan v. KyleWashington Supreme Court · 1894

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API