Legal Opinion

Mahoney v. Tingley

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 1, 1974No. 1755-1PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHorowitz, J.

Plaintiff Laura E. Mahoney sued to recover damages for breach of an earnest money agreement by defendants Claude W. Tingley and Nancy J. Tingley, his wife. Later the court granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment of dismissal. Plaintiff appeals.

The controlling issue is whether, under the facts here, a liquidated damage clause contained in the earnest money agreement raises a genuine issue of material fact concerning the validity of that clause precluding entry of summary judgment in favor of defendants. The facts are these.

On October 23, 1970, the parties entered into a printed form of…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Broderick Wood Products Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
  2. William Edward Roucher v. Traders & General Insurance Company, Dallas, TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
  3. Gordon v. Deer Park School District No. 414Washington Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Daniel Henry Arney and Charles H. Baker v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  5. Hogan v. KyleWashington Supreme Court · 1894

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mahoney v. TingleyWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Kemp v. GannettAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  3. Mahoney v. TingleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  4. Mueller v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API