McKown v. Davis
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDonworth, J.
May the vendee named in an earnest money agreement, who has been unsuccessful in a prior action to rescind that contract on the grounds of fraudulent representations, subsequently maintain an action for specific performance of that contract?
On May 3, 1951, plaintiffs (Charles McKown and Henrietta McKown, his wife) as vendees, and defendants (Floyd Davis and Frances Davis, his wife) as vendors, executed a written contract of sale, denominated “Earnest Money Agreement,” wherein “the terms and conditions of this agreement and sale” were set forth in detail, and receipt was acknowledged, by…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McDonald v. WocknerWashington Supreme Court · 1954
- Labor Hall Ass'n, Inc. v. DanielsenWashington Supreme Court · 1945
- Mathews v. HeiserWashington Supreme Court · 1953
- Stimson Mill Co. v. Anacortes Veneer, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1954
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ferris v. BlumhardtWashington Supreme Court · 1956
- McKown v. DriverWashington Supreme Court · 1959
- Brillhardt v. Ben Tipp, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1956
- Fines v. West Side Implement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1960
- Mading v. McPhadenWashington Supreme Court · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.