Legal Opinion
Salter v. Heiser
Washington Supreme Court
Decided June 8, 1950No. 31213PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.
For some time prior to 1947, the defendant, Richard P. Heiser, was the owner of a tract of land, approximately forty acres in extent, in section 7, township 22 north, range 6 east W. M., King county. The tract had been improved with a dance hall, a tavern, log cabins, picnic grounds, baseball field, tennis courts, and contained a lake suitable for boating and swimming. It had been operated as an amusement resort by Mr. Heiser.
The plaintiffs David H. and Blanche M. Salter (who will be herein referred to as Salter, Sr.) are the parents of plaintiff David H. Salter, Jr. (who will be referred to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Webster v. L. Romano Engineering Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1934
- Palladine v. Imperial Valley Farm Lands Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1924
- Zimmerman v. BitnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1894
- City of Tacoma v. Tacoma Light & Water Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1897
- Dorr v. CorySupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Liebergesell v. EvansWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- McCutcheon v. BrownfieldCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
- Hilton v. MumawCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Pope v. University of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Salter v. HeiserWashington Supreme Court · 1951
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.