Legal Opinion
A. Secondino & Son, Inc. v. LoRicco
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 12, 1990No. 13773PublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.
The principal issues in this case are: (1) the right of a home improvement contractor who has failed to comply with the written contract requirement of the Home Improvement Act; General Statutes § 20-429;1 to recover damages, under theories of quasi contract, for completed home improvements; and (2) the right of a homeowner to recover compensatory and punitive damages pursuant to the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA); General Statutes § 42-110a et seq.; for violation of the Home Improvement Act. The plaintiff, A. Secondino & Son, Inc., initiated this action for damages under…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hinchliffe v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Conaway v. PrestiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Barrett Builders v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Barco Auto Leasing Corp. v. HouseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Web Press Services Corp. v. New London Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
3Cited by68 opinions
- Habetz v. CondonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Wadia Enterprises, Inc. v. HirschfeldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Haesche v. KissnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Citaramanis v. HallowellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Rizzo Pool Co. v. Del GrossoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.