Legal Opinion

Citaramanis v. Hallowell

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 14, 1992No. 120, September Term, 1991PublishedCited by 88 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KARWACKI, Judge.

This case presents two important questions for our consideration: (1) whether in a private action under the Maryland Consumer Protection Act, a tenant may obtain restitution of rent paid for premises that are not licensed as required by a local housing code upon proof of no more than lack of licensure; and (2) whether a tenant is entitled to restitution of voluntary rent payments made on an unenforceable lease.

I

Responding to an advertisement in the Columbia Flyer, a newspaper circulated in Howard County, Tammy and Michael CitaraManis (the CitaraManises or tenants) inspected a…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Leardi v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  2. John E. Rosasco Creameries, Inc. v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  3. Conaway v. PrestiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  4. Schank v. . SchuchmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. Consumer Protection Division Office of the Attorney General v. Consumer Publishing Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by88 opinions

  1. Lloyd v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  2. Stewart v. BiermanDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2012
  3. Bourgeois v. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2014
  4. Morris v. Osmose Wood PreservingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  5. Sager v. Housing CommissionDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2012

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API