Citaramanis v. Hallowell
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
KARWACKI, Judge.
This case presents two important questions for our consideration: (1) whether in a private action under the Maryland Consumer Protection Act, a tenant may obtain restitution of rent paid for premises that are not licensed as required by a local housing code upon proof of no more than lack of licensure; and (2) whether a tenant is entitled to restitution of voluntary rent payments made on an unenforceable lease.
I
Responding to an advertisement in the Columbia Flyer, a newspaper circulated in Howard County, Tammy and Michael CitaraManis (the CitaraManises or tenants) inspected a…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Leardi v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- John E. Rosasco Creameries, Inc. v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Conaway v. PrestiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Schank v. . SchuchmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
- Consumer Protection Division Office of the Attorney General v. Consumer Publishing Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by88 opinions
- Lloyd v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Stewart v. BiermanDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2012
- Bourgeois v. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2014
- Morris v. Osmose Wood PreservingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Sager v. Housing CommissionDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2012
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.