Legal Opinion
Rizzo Pool Co. v. Del Grosso
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 11, 1995No. 14973; 14974PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPalmer, J.
The principal issue raised by this appeal is whether a certain contract between the plaintiff, Rizzo Pool Company, and the defendants, Daniel Del Grosso and Jo-Ann Del Grosso, for the installation of a swimming pool on the defendants’ property is subject to the provisions of the Home Improvement Act (HIA).1 The plaintiff commenced this action for breach of contract when the defendants refused to allow the plaintiff to install the pool pursuant to the contract. The case was tried to a jury, which returned a verdict for the plaintiff. The trial court rendered judgment for the plaintiff in…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Hinchliffe v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Berry v. LoiseauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Liljedahl Bros. v. GrigsbySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Habetz v. CondonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Conaway v. PrestiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Murphy v. International Robotic Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2000
- Gagne v. VaccaroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Rizzo Pool Co. v. Del GrossoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Meadows v. HigginsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Goins v. JBC & Associates, P.C.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.