Legal Opinion
Barco Auto Leasing Corp. v. House
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 20, 1987No. 12655PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.
The principal issue on this appeal is whether the trial court properly calculated the amount of damages to which the defendants were entitled upon rescission of an instalment sales contract under the Retail Instalment Sales Financing Act (hereinafter RISFA), General Statutes §§ 42-83 through 42-100a. This action was brought by the plaintiff, Barco Auto Leasing Corporation (hereinafter Barco), against the defendants, Veota House, Sr., and Charles House, to recover a deficiency under an alleged leasing agreement for the rental of an automobile. The defendants responded by filing an answer and…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Heslin v. Connecticut Law Clinic of Trantolo & TrantoloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Hamm v. TaylorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Sportsmen's Boating Corp. v. HensleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Joyce Shirley v. State National Bank of ConnecticutCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- State v. AnonymousSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Normand Josef Enterprises, Inc. v. Connecticut National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- A. Secondino & Son, Inc. v. LoRiccoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Smith v. SnyderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Rizzo Pool Co. v. Del GrossoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Teresa T. v. RagagliaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.