Legal Opinion
Habetz v. Condon
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 22, 1992No. 14461PublishedCited by 174 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKatz, J.
The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether a home improvement contractor can recover damages from a homeowner who acted in bad faith for work performed under a contract that did not comply with General Statutes § 20-429 (a),1 which is part of chapter 400, General Statutes §§ 20-418 through 20-432, known as the Home Improvement Act (act). The plaintiff Peter Habetz, Jr.,2 filed a multicount complaint against the defendant, Ken Condon, doing business as Condon Contracting, alleging breach of contract, certain statutory violations and negligence. The defendant counterclaimed to recover for…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Glus v. Brooklyn Eastern District TerminalSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Liljedahl Bros. v. GrigsbySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Buckman v. People Express, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Novella v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Barrett Builders v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by174 opinions
- Home Insurance v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Northwest, Inc. v. GinsbergSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Jackson v. R. G. Whipple, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Wadia Enterprises, Inc. v. HirschfeldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Gupta v. New Britain General HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
169 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.