Legal Opinion
Hinchliffe v. American Motors Corp.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 21, 1981PublishedCited by 212 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtParskey, J.
This lawsuit arose from the plaintiffs’ purchase of a new American Motors Jeep Wagoneer. The plaintiffs commenced this action with a six-count complaint, alleging fraud, breach of implied and express warranties, and violations of the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA), General Statutes §§42-110a through *60942-llOq.1 After the plaintiffs presented their evidence at trial, the defendants moved for a judgment of dismissal, claiming that the plaintiffs had failed to make out a prima facie case on all counts. See Practice Book § 302. The trial court found that no ascertainable damages had…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Lukas v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Johnson v. HealySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Harper v. AdametzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Stelco Industries, Inc. v. CohenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Crowell v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by212 opinions
- Willow Springs Condominium Ass'n v. Seventh BRT Development Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Karen Maguire, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Citicorp Retail Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Cheshire Mortgage Service, Inc. v. MontesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Larsen Chelsey Realty Co. v. LarsenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Fink v. GolenbockSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
207 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.