Legal Opinion
Wadia Enterprises, Inc. v. Hirschfeld
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 22, 1992No. 14540PublishedCited by 136 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKatz, J.
The principal issue in this case is whether the plaintiff contractor produced sufficient evidence of the defendant homeowners’ alleged bad faith so as to survive their motion for summary judgment under the Home Improvement Act (act), General Statutes § 20-418 et seq. The plaintiff appeals from the judgment of the Appellate Court affirming the decision of the trial court granting the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. We affirm.
The plaintiff, Wadia Enterprises, Inc., brought an action to recover damages against the defendants, Carolyne Hirschfeld, also known as Caroline Hirschfeld, and…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- United Oil Co. v. Urban Redevelopment CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Connell v. ColwellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Strada v. Connecticut Newspapers, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- D.H.R. Construction Co. v. DonnellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Liljedahl Bros. v. GrigsbySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by136 opinions
- Heyman Associates No. 1 v. Insurance Co. of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Gupta v. New Britain General HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Daley v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Celentano v. Oaks Condominium Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Hopkins v. O'CONNORSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
131 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.