Legal Opinion
Haesche v. Kissner
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 18, 1994No. 14721PublishedCited by 121 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNorcott, J.
The dispositive issue in this products liability appeal is whether the evidence before the trial court raised a genuine issue of material fact regarding whether the conduct of the manufacturer defendant, Coleman Company, Inc. (Coleman), was the proximate cause of the named plaintiffs injuries. We conclude that no genuine issue of material fact existed and that the trial court, therefore, properly granted Coleman’s motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment.
The plaintiff, sixteen year old William Haesche,1 brought this action against Coleman2 for alleged violations of the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hinchliffe v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Connecticut Bank & Trust Co. v. Carriage Lane AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Conaway v. PrestiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Mather v. Griffin HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Zichichi v. Middlesex Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by121 opinions
- Miller v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Heyman Associates No. 1 v. Insurance Co. of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Vacco v. Microsoft Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Annamarie Lamontagne, Doreen A. Festa and Susan B. Pregler v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Beers v. Bayliner Marine Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
116 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.