Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Rengachary
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 16, 2000No. C7-98-1987PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RUSSELL A. ANDERSON, Justice.
Appellant Setti Rengachary, M.D., appeals from the Minnesota Court of Appeals’ reversal of the district court’s order denying respondent Kathleen Anderson’s request for reconsideration of the dismissal of her medical malpractice suit against appellant. Ms. Anderson served an affidavit of expert identification as required by Minn.Stat. § 145.682, subd. 4 (1998) and, after the 180-day statutory deadline expired, Dr. Rengachary moved to dismiss the suit. The district court concluded that Ms. Anderson had not submitted a sufficient affidavit of expert…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Tuma v. Commissioner of Economic SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Sorenson v. St. Paul Ramsey Medical CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Bellecourt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- Lindberg v. Health Partners, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Martin Ex Rel. Hoff v. City of RochesterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Brown-Wilbert, Inc. v. Copeland Buhl & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Teffeteller v. University of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Broehm v. Mayo Clinic RochesterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- Mercer v. AndersenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.