Legal Opinion
Brown-Wilbert, Inc. v. Copeland Buhl & Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 31, 2007No. A05-340, A05-1952PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HANSON, Justice.
These appeals arise out of two civil actions brought by Chris Brown and Brown-Wilbert, Inc. (collectively Brown-Wilbert), against Copeland Buhl & Company and Lee Harren (collectively Accountants). The first complaint was served in March 2004 and contained four counts: (1) breach of contract, (2) breach of fiduciary duty, (3) accounting malpractice, and (4) restitution (BW-I). The district court granted Accountants’ motion to dismiss all counts of BW-I under Minn.Stat. § 544.42 (2006), on the grounds that Brown-Wilbert failed to timely serve an affidavit of expert review…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Deposit Bank v. FrankfortSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Sorenson v. St. Paul Ramsey Medical CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Wartnick v. Moss & BarnettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Busch v. Busch Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Hauser v. MealeySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Lavera Granetha Ashanti v. City of Golden ValleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- Laase v. County of IsantiCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Scott H. Lansing v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
- Schmitz v. RINKE, NOONANCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- Feed Management Systems, Inc. v. BrillDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2007
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.