Legal Opinion
Mercer v. Andersen
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 6, 2006No. A05-1103PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
The district court dismissed with prejudice Robert Mercer’s medical-malpractice claims against Steven Andersen and partially dismissed his malpractice claims against the remaining defendants for failure to comply with the expert-review requirements of Minn.Stat. § 145.682 (2004). On appeal Mercer challenges both dismissals. Because we conclude that the district court properly exercised its jurisdiction by dismissing the complaint against Andersen as outside the statute of limitations, correctly applied the statutory expert-review requirements, and acted within its…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Day v. McDonoughSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. SchlunkSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Eberhart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Sorenson v. St. Paul Ramsey Medical CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Semler v. KlangCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
- Pfeiffer ex rel. Pfeiffer v. Allina Health SystemCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- State Ex Rel. Swan Lake Area Wildlife Ass'n v. Nicollet County Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- Witzke v. Mesabi Rehabilitation Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- TC/American Monorail, Inc. v. Custom Conveyor Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.