Legal Opinion

Teffeteller v. University of Minnesota

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 13, 2002No. C8-00-1935PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STRINGER, Justice.

Respondent Jean Teffeteller, as trustee for the heirs of Thad Roddy, commenced this medical malpractice action against appellant University of Minnesota, doing business as University of Minnesota Hospital and Clinics, and appellant Pediatric Research and Education Foundation (PREF) alleging that both appellants negligently failed to recognize signs of morphine toxicity, and faded to appropriately treat morphine toxicity resulting in Rod-dy’s death. The district court granted appellants’ motions for dismissal ruling that respondent’s expert was not qualified to testify…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sorenson v. St. Paul Ramsey Medical CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Cornfeldt v. TongenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Lindberg v. Health Partners, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  4. Stroud v. Hennepin County Medical CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  5. Swanson Ex Rel. Swanson v. ChattertonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Brown-Wilbert, Inc. v. Copeland Buhl & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  2. Yang v. Voyagaire Houseboats, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  3. Gorney v. MeaneyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  4. Lake Superior Center Authority v. Hammel, Green & Abrahamson, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
  5. Carlson v. Sala Architects, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API