Broehm v. Mayo Clinic Rochester
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, Russell A., Justice.
Appellant brought a medical malpractice action in connection with injury incurred during post-operative care following tracheal resection surgery. The district court granted defendant’s motion to dismiss on grounds that appellant had failed to comply with the expert witness disclosure requirements of Minn.Stat. § 145.682 (2004). The court of appeals affirmed, and we granted further review. Concluding that appellant’s expert disclosure was sufficient to preclude mandatory dismissal of a nursing malpractice cause of action, we affirm in part, reverse in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Sorenson v. St. Paul Ramsey Medical CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Cornfeldt v. TongenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Lindberg v. Health Partners, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- STATE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY BY THE SPECIAL COMPENSATION FUND v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Weston v. McWilliams & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- Gaines v. COMANCHE COUNTY MEDICAL HOSPITAL & NURSEFINDERS, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- Lake Superior Center Authority v. Hammel, Green & Abrahamson, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- Patricio Flores v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.