Legal Opinion

Broehm v. Mayo Clinic Rochester

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 20, 2005No. C0-02-959PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, Russell A., Justice.

Appellant brought a medical malpractice action in connection with injury incurred during post-operative care following tracheal resection surgery. The district court granted defendant’s motion to dismiss on grounds that appellant had failed to comply with the expert witness disclosure requirements of Minn.Stat. § 145.682 (2004). The court of appeals affirmed, and we granted further review. Concluding that appellant’s expert disclosure was sufficient to preclude mandatory dismissal of a nursing malpractice cause of action, we affirm in part, reverse in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Sorenson v. St. Paul Ramsey Medical CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  3. Cornfeldt v. TongenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. Lindberg v. Health Partners, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  5. STATE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY BY THE SPECIAL COMPENSATION FUND v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Weston v. McWilliams & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  2. State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  3. Gaines v. COMANCHE COUNTY MEDICAL HOSPITAL & NURSEFINDERS, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  4. Lake Superior Center Authority v. Hammel, Green & Abrahamson, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
  5. Patricio Flores v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API