Legal Opinion

Arnold Bernhard & Co. v. Planning & Zoning Commission

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided August 7, 1984No. 12387PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.

The principal issue on this appeal is whether the town of Westport is authorized by statute to enact a zoning moratorium. The plaintiff, Arnold Bernhard and Company, Inc., appealed from the decision of the defendant, Westport planning and zoning commission (commission), imposing a nine month moratorium on the acceptance and granting of applications for business development within a fourteen acre section of the Westport business district in which the plaintiff owns a piece of property. The plaintiff sought declaratory and injunctive relief to invalidate the moratorium, and to direct the…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Golden v. Planning Board of RamapoNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Kline v. HarrisburgSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. Reynolds v. VroomSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
  4. A.P. & W. Holding Corp. v. Planning & Zoning BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
  5. Monmouth Lumber Co. v. Township of OceanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Protect Hamden/North Haven from Excessive Traffic & Pollution, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  2. Red Hill Coalition, Inc. v. Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  3. Cioffoletti v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  4. Harris v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  5. Naylor v. Township of HellamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API