Legal Opinion
Golden v. Planning Board of Ramapo
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 3, 1972PublishedCited by 122 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtScileppi, J.
Both cases arise out of the 1969 amendments to the Town of Ramapo’s Zoning Ordinance. In Golden, petitioners, the owner of record and contract vendee, by way of a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 sought an order reviewing and annulling a decision and determination of the Planning Board of the Town of Ramapo which denied their application for preliminary approval of a residential subdivision plat because of an admitted failure to secure a special permit as required by section 46-13.1 of the Town zoning ordinance prohibiting subdivision approval except where the residential developer has…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Arverne Bay Construction Co. v. ThatcherNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Rodgers v. Village of TarrytownNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- National Land & Investment Co. v. Easttown Township Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by122 opinions
- Associated Home Builders of Greater Eastbay, Inc. v. City of LivermoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Southern Burlington County N.A.A.C.P. v. Township of Mount LaurelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
- Fred F. French Investing Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Construction Industry Association of Sonoma County, a California Nonprofit Corporation v. The City of Petaluma, a California Charter CityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Berenson v. Town of New CastleNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
117 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.