Legal Opinion

Naylor v. Township of Hellam

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 20, 2001No. 96-SU-04112-08PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ZAPPALA, Justice.

This appeal presents the issue of whether a municipality may enact a temporary moratorium on certain types of subdivision and land development while the municipality revises its zoning and subdivision land development ordinances. We hold that the Municipalities Planning Code (MPC), Act of July 31, 1968, P.L. 805, as reenacted and 'amended, 53 P.S. §§ 10101-11202, does not grant a municipality such power and therefore reverse the order of the Commonwealth Court, which held to the contrary.

The undisputed facts establish that Appellants, Irvin S. Naylor, Harry H. Fox,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Phillips v. A-Best Products Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Dean v. Com., Dept. of Transp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Kline v. HarrisburgSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. Exton Quarries, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  5. Shirk v. Lancaster CitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BattsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Quinby v. Plumsteadville Family Practice, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Lance v. WyethSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Seebold v. Prison Health Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. City of Philadelphia v. SchweikerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API