Legal Opinion

Kline v. Harrisburg

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 24, 1949PublishedCited by 117 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The facts are stated in the opinion by WOODSIDE, J., of the court below, as follows:

The plaintiffs here are seeking to restrain the City of Harrisburg and certain of its officials from enforcing the provisions of what is sometimes called an "interim" zoning ordinance, and to direct the proper city official to issue a building permit to the plaintiffs authorizing the construction of five apartment buildings in the city.

It is admitted by the defendants that the application, drawing and specifications and statement on the basis of which the building permit was requested conform in all respects…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Miller v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. White's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. Taylor v. MooreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  4. Mudano v. Phila. Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  5. National Transportation Co., Inc. v. ToquetSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by117 opinions

  1. Lord AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Cleaver v. Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  3. Kelly v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. Allentown School District Mercantile Tax CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  5. Exton Quarries, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967

112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API