Legal Opinion
Caffe v. Caffe
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 25, 1997No. 15400PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MCDONALD, J.
The sole issue raised by this certified appeal is whether, in this marriage dissolution action, the Appellate Court properly reversed the trial court’s judgment as to financial matters on the ground that the trial court failed to refer to the statutes governing such matters. Caffe v. Caffe, 236 Conn. 917, 673 A.2d 1144 (1996). Because we conclude that the trial court1 stated that it had considered the criteria enumerated in the relevant statutes and that the trial court need not have referred specifically to such statutes, we reverse the Appellate Court’s judgment.
The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Weiman v. WeimanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Carpenter v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Rostain v. RostainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Savage v. SavageConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- Siracusa v. SiracusaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Simmons v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Bornemann v. BornemannSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Unkelbach v. McNarySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Blumenthal v. Kimber Manufacturing, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.