Legal Opinion
Smith v. Smith
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 15, 1999No. SC 15978PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KATZ, J.
The defendant, Sheilah T. Smith, appeals and the plaintiff, Prentice K. Smith, Jr., cross appeals1 from the judgment of the trial court dissolving the parties’ marriage, ordering child support, ordering dual alimony pursuant to General Statutes § 46b-82,2 and *267ordering a property distribution pursuant to General Statutes § 46b-81.3 The issues to be decided on appeal are whether: (1) the trial court, pursuant to § 46b-81, properly retained continuing jurisdiction over the present case in order to have the authority to divide the plaintiffs interest in any family trust (Smith…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Conway v. Town of WiltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Connecticut National Bank v. GiacomiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Amodio v. AmodioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Krafick v. KrafickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Bender v. BenderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Jewett v. JewettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Opoku v. GrantConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Mickey v. MickeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Maturo v. MaturoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.