Unkelbach v. McNary
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KATZ, J.
The issues to be decided in this appeal are whether: (1) in modifying the defendant’s child support obligation, the trial court properly considered contributions made by the defendant’s domestic partner toward *352their shared living expenses as an element of the defendant’s gross income under the Child Support and Arrear-age Guidelines (guidelines);1 (2) the trial court abused its discretion in ordering the defendant to pay $1000 per month in arrearage payments, in addition to his child support obligation of $252 per week; (3) the trial court abused its discretion by not…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Conway v. Town of WiltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Turner v. TurnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Weiman v. WeimanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Koizim v. KoizimSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- McGuinness v. McGuinnessSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Bornemann v. BornemannSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Longley v. State Employees Retirement CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Misthopoulos v. MisthopoulosSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- In re Joshua S.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Maturo v. MaturoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.