Legal Opinion

Unkelbach v. McNary

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 31, 1998No. SC 15740PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KATZ, J.

The issues to be decided in this appeal are whether: (1) in modifying the defendant’s child support obligation, the trial court properly considered contributions made by the defendant’s domestic partner toward *352their shared living expenses as an element of the defendant’s gross income under the Child Support and Arrear-age Guidelines (guidelines);1 (2) the trial court abused its discretion in ordering the defendant to pay $1000 per month in arrearage payments, in addition to his child support obligation of $252 per week; (3) the trial court abused its discretion by not…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Conway v. Town of WiltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  2. Turner v. TurnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  3. Weiman v. WeimanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  4. Koizim v. KoizimSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  5. McGuinness v. McGuinnessSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Bornemann v. BornemannSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  2. Longley v. State Employees Retirement CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  3. Misthopoulos v. MisthopoulosSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  4. In re Joshua S.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  5. Maturo v. MaturoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API