Legal Opinion
Blumenthal v. Kimber Manufacturing, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 29, 2003No. SC 16912PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KATZ, J.
The petitioner, Bichard Blumenthal, the attorney general of the state of Connecticut, appeals1 from the decision of the trial court denying his applica*3tion for an order requiring the respondents, Kimber Manufacturing, Inc. (Kimber), a firearms manufacturer with its principal place of business in Yonkers, New York, and Leslie Edelman, Kimber’s president, to comply with the petitioner’s discovery request for a certain document sent from one Kimber employee to an attorney and three other Kimber employees.2 The petitioner contends that the trial court improperly determined that:…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Consolidation Coal Co. v. Bucyrus-Erie Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982
- Olson v. Accessory Controls & Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Ullmann v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Cologne v. Westfarms AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- PSE Consulting, Inc. v. MercedeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Harty v. Cantor Fitzgerald and Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Kelly v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Barry v. Quality Steel Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Hutchinson v. Farm Family Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.