Legal Opinion
Weiman v. Weiman
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 31, 1982PublishedCited by 119 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtF. Hennessy, J.
The plaintiff appealed and the defendant cross appealed from the judgment of the trial court dissolving their marriage.
The defendant wife claims that the court abused its discretion in the amount of alimony awarded, the duration of the alimony awarded, and the assignment of property. The plaintiff husband claims the court abused its discretion in awarding the defendant $10,000 in counsel fees in order to bring this appeal.
In determining whether to award alimony, the court “shall consider the length of the marriage, the causes for the annulment, dissolution of the marriage or legal separation,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Koizim v. KoizimSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Beede v. BeedeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Dubicki v. DubickiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Scoville v. ScovilleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by119 opinions
- Barnes v. BarnesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Carpenter v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Borkowski v. BorkowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- O'Neill v. O'NeillConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Rubin v. RubinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.