Legal Opinion
Siracusa v. Siracusa
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 9, 1993No. 10824PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.
In this dissolution action, the defendant appeals from the judgment rendered, claiming that the trial court improperly (1) determined periodic financial orders and a property distribution schedule, (2) awarded time-limited alimony,1 (3) distributed the marital estate, (4) determined the value of the family business, and (5) exercised excessively broad discretion over financial and commercial business issues not involving custody or marital matters. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts are pertinent to this appeal. The parties met while attending college. Following his…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Gallo v. GalloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Leo v. LeoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- O'Neill v. O'NeillConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Krafick v. KrafickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Passamano v. PassamanoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Rummel v. RummelConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Caffe v. CaffeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Wolf v. WolfConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.