Legal Opinion
Rostain v. Rostain
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 13, 1990No. 13697PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArthur H. Healey, J.
This is an appeal from certain orders concerning the judgment by the trial court, Bassick, J., dissolving the parties’ marriage. The defendant wife contends, inter alia, that the trial court erred in (1) finding certain facts concerning the distribution of property, both real and personal,1 and (2) *687refusing to award her periodic alimony pursuant to General Statutes § 46b-82.* 2 Because we remand this case for further articulation of the court’s factual findings, we do not need to address the defendant’s other claims of error.
The parties were first married in 1958. As a result of this…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Kaplan v. KaplanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Gallo v. GalloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Solomon v. AbermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Koizim v. KoizimSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Habetz v. CondonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Larsen Chelsey Realty Co. v. LarsenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Jackson v. R. G. Whipple, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Lauer v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Krafick v. KrafickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.