Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Holden

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 16, 1996No. 4153PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAUGER, Vice Chief Justice:

The complainant, Oklahoma Bar Association (Bar Association), charged the respondent, Darril L. Holden (Holden/attomey), with three counts of misconduct. All three counts related to the attorney’s unauthorized practice of law while under a disciplinary suspension1 and to his dishonesty in responding to grievance inquiries. The attorney admitted Ms misconduct. We find that tMs conduct — involving, in part, a blatant disregard of tMs Court’s prior order of suspension — warrants a two year and one day suspension and the payment of costs in the amount of $235.43.2

*34AGREED…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. RaskinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. Tweedy v. Oklahoma Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  3. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. DonnellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  4. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. FarrantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  5. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n. v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. PattersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  2. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. MinterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  3. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. WolfeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  4. In Re the Reinstatement of MunsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
  5. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. MinterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API