State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n. v. Johnston
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPALA, Justice.
In this disciplinary proceeding against a lawyer, the issues to be decided are: (1) Is the record, consisting of the stipulated facts and a transcript of proceedings, sufficient for a meaningful de novo consideration of the complaint’s disposition? and (2) Is a four-month suspension an appropriate disciplinary sanction to be imposed for respondent’s professional misconduct? We answer both questions in the affirmative.
The Oklahoma Bar Association [Bar] charged Robert L. Johnston [Johnston or respondent], a licensed lawyer, with one count of professional misconduct. The Bar and…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. RaskinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Tweedy v. Oklahoma Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. DonnellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- In Re Integration of State Bar of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. StubblefieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by106 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. EakinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. FarrantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. DorisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. BoluskySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.