Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Minter
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 11, 2001No. SCBD 4358PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOpala, J.
{ 1 In this disciplinary proceeding against a lawyer, the issues to be decided are: (1) Does the record submitted for our examination provide sufficient evidence for a meaningful de novo consideration of the complaint and of its disposition? 1 and (2) Is a suspension from the practice of law for two years and one day an appropriate disciplinary sanction for respondent's breach of professional ethics? We answer both questions in the affirmative.
I
INTRODUCTION TO THE RECORD
T2 The Oklahoma Bar Association (the Bar or complainant) charged Joseph Oliver Minter, V (Minter or respondent), a licensed…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
- City of Chicago v. MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. GigerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. MothershedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. AlbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. CombsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. PacenzaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.