Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Minter

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 12, 1998No. SCBD 4229PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

961 P.2d 208 (1998)

1998 OK 59

STATE of Oklahoma ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION, Complainant,

v.

Joseph O. MINTER, V, Respondent.

No. SCBD 4229.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

June 9, 1998.

As Corrected June 12, 1998.

Joseph O. Minter, V, Madill, pro se.

Dan Murdock, General Counsel, Mike Speegle, Asistant General Counsel, Oklahoma Bar Association, Oklahoma City.

HODGES, Justice.

I. OVERVIEW

¶ 1 Complainant, Oklahoma Bar Association, alleged two counts of misconduct warranting discipline against respondent attorney, Joseph O. Minter, V (Respondent). The Complainant sought enhancement of the discipline based…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Personnel Administrator of Mass. v. FeeneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Mabry v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. MothershedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
  2. Rivas v. Parkland ManorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
  3. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. MinterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  4. STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. LAYTONSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
  5. STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. KNIGHTSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API