Legal Opinion

People v. Whitcomb

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 28, 1991No. 91SA282PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

A hearing panel of the Supreme Court Grievance Committee unanimously approved the findings of the hearing board and recommended that the respondent in this attorney disciplinary proceeding be disbarred for conversion of trust funds, that he be ordered to make restitution to the trust as a condition for readmission, and that he be assessed the costs of the proceeding. The respondent defaulted before the hearing board and he has not appeared in this court. We accept the recommendation of the hearing panel, order that the respondent be disbarred and that he pay restitution, interest, and costs.

I

T…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. CrimaldiSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  2. People v. KramerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  3. People v. CaltSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  4. People v. WhitcombSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  5. People v. VernonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. YoungSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  2. People v. FinesilverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  3. People v. KearnsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  4. People v. OgbornSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  5. People v. MargolinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API