Legal Opinion

People v. Finesilver

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 18, 1992No. 91SA109PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Per curiam

A hearing board in this attorney discipline proceeding found that the respondent, Jay Mark Finesilver, converted trust funds and forged a court document. The board recommended that the respondent be disbarred and be ordered to pay restitution and costs. A hearing panel of the Supreme Court Grievance Committee unanimously approved the findings and recommendation of the board. We accept the panel’s recommendation and order that the respondent be disbarred.

I

The respondent was admitted to the bar of this court on May 15, 1981. He is registered as an attorney upon this court’s official records,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re WilsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  2. People v. AbelmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  3. People v. MargolinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  4. People v. MulliganSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  5. People v. GrossenbachSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. People v. YoungSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  2. People v. LeflySupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  3. People v. KearnsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  4. People v. OgbornSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  5. People v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API