Legal Opinion

People v. Ogborn

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 19, 1994No. 94SA239PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

The respondent 1 in these lawyer disciplinary proceedings converted a large amount of client funds by fraudulently billing and double-billing for expenses, including personal expenses. A hearing panel unanimously accepted the findings and recommendation of a hearing board that the respondent be disbarred and be ordered to pay costs. The respondent excepted to the panel’s recommendation on the ground that disbarment was too severe a sanction given the circumstances in mitigation. We accept the panel’s recommendation and order that the respondent be disbarred.

I

The assistant disciplinary counsel…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. RobnettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  2. People v. YoungSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  3. People v. FinesilverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  4. People v. KearnsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  5. People v. MulliganSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In Re ClelandSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  2. People v. LujanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  3. People v. LavenharSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  4. People v. GoldsteinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  5. People v. GuyersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API