Legal Opinion

People v. Young

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 6, 1993No. 93SA294PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Per curiam

The respondent 1 in this disciplinary proceeding and the assistant disciplinary counsel entered into a stipulation, agreement, and conditional admission of misconduct. See C.R.C.P. 241.18. The assistant disciplinary counsel recommended, and the respondent consented to, the imposition of disbarment as a disciplinary sanction for the respondent’s misconduct which involved the conversion of client funds. An inquiry panel of the Supreme Court Grievance Committee approved the stipulation. We accept the stipulation and agreement, and order that the respondent be disbarred and be assessed costs.

I

The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. RobnettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  2. People v. FinesilverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  3. People v. KearnsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  4. People v. MulliganSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  5. People v. GrossenbachSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. People v. VaralloSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  2. In Re ClelandSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  3. In re HainesSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008
  4. People v. GuyersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  5. People v. LeflySupreme Court of Colorado · 1995

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API