Legal Opinion

People v. Calt

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 16, 1991No. 91SA215PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

In this attorney discipline case, a hearing panel of the Supreme Court Grievance Committee unanimously approved the findings of the hearing board, and recommended that the respondent be disbarred for counseling and assisting his client in conduct that the respondent knew to be illegal or fraudulent, for engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, and for illegal conduct involving moral turpitude. Neither the respondent nor the assistant disciplinary counsel have excepted to the hearing panel’s recommendation. We agree that the seriousness of the respondent’s misconduct warrants disbarment, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. DistelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  2. People v. SullivanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  3. People v. BergmannSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  4. People v. VernonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. YoungSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  2. People v. FinesilverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  3. People v. KearnsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  4. People v. OgbornSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  5. People v. MargolinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API