Legal Opinion

People v. Margolin

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 25, 1991No. 91SA352PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

A hearing panel of the Supreme Court Grievance Committee unanimously approved the findings and recommendation of the hearing board that the respondent in these attorney disciplinary proceedings be disbarred and assessed costs. Neither the respondent nor the assistant disciplinary counsel has excepted to this recommendation. Considering the seriousness of the respondent’s misconduct, which involved the conversion of client funds by means of a fraudulent scheme, we accept the recommendation of the panel and order that the respondent be disbarred and that he pay the costs of the proceeding.

I

The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re WilsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  2. Matter of SteinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  3. People v. MulliganSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  4. People v. GrossenbachSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  5. People v. KramerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. FinesilverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  2. People v. KearnsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  3. People v. DiceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  4. People v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  5. People v. NulanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API