Legal Opinion

People v. Kramer

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 21, 1991No. 91SA220PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

The respondent, Leonard G. Kramer, defaulted in this attorney disciplinary proceeding, and he has not appeared in this court. A hearing panel of the Supreme Court Grievance Committee approved the recommendation of a hearing board that the respondent be disbarred, pay restitution as a condition of readmission, and be assessed the costs of the proceeding. We accept the recommendation of the hearing panel, order that the respondent be disbarred and that he pay restitution, interest, and costs.

I

The respondent was admitted to the bar of this court on June 22, 1960, is registered as an attorney…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. CrimaldiSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  2. People v. CaltSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  3. People v. SusmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  4. People v. VernonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  5. People v. KramerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. YoungSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  2. People v. FinesilverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  3. People v. KearnsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  4. People v. OgbornSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  5. People v. MargolinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API